XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO
XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) and XFN.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XFN.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO returned 17.72%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for XFN.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIT.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for XFN.TO.
Performance
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than XFN.TO's 17.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO has outperformed XFN.TO with an annualized return of 17.72%, while XFN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.21% annualized return.
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
XFN.TO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 48.08%
- 3Y*
- 31.45%
- 5Y*
- 18.22%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -7.03% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.74% | 45.91% | 60.88% | 11.71% | 17.09% |
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF | 17.97% | 34.40% | 29.32% | 13.09% | -9.92% | 35.57% | 0.99% | 20.66% | -9.76% | 12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIT.TO and XFN.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.44 |
The correlation between XIT.TO and XFN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIT.TO
XFN.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XIT.TO
XFN.TO
-
Financial Services
XIT.TO
XFN.TO
Industrials
XIT.TO
XFN.TO
-
Basic Materials
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Communication Services
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Energy
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Healthcare
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Real Estate
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Utilities
XIT.TO
-
XFN.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIT.TO
XFN.TO
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIT.TO | XFN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.70 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 6.20 | -6.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 25.03 | -24.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, roughly equal to the maximum XFN.TO drawdown of -55.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and XFN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIT.TO | XFN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -55.53% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -7.80% | -24.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.93% | -12.37% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.15% | -21.90% | -32.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | -39.93% | -14.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.01% | 0.00% | -17.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -6.95% | -9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.98% | 1.93% | +14.05% |
Volatility
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) at 4.08%. This indicates that XIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIT.TO | XFN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.65% | 4.08% | +6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.63% | 10.20% | +14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.61% | 12.24% | +19.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 13.50% | +15.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.56% | 16.54% | +12.02% |
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XFN.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF | 2.07% | 2.39% | 3.16% | 3.60% | 3.48% | 2.67% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.43% | 2.73% | 2.83% | 3.17% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIT.TO and XFN.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XFN.TO.
XIT.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while XFN.TO is Financials Equities. XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XFN.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.61% for XFN.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and XFN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer