XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO
XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO returned 17.57%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for XEG.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIT.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for XEG.TO.
Performance
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO has outperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 17.57%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.85% annualized return.
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
XEG.TO
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 44.34%
- 6M
- 39.73%
- 1Y
- 70.40%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 29.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -4.19% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.73% | 45.91% | 60.77% | 11.71% | 17.06% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 44.34% | 16.72% | 14.08% | 3.52% | 53.25% | 83.71% | -34.41% | 8.98% | -27.05% | -11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIT.TO and XEG.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2001 | 0.21 |
The correlation between XIT.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIT.TO
XEG.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XIT.TO
XEG.TO
-
Financial Services
XIT.TO
XEG.TO
-
Industrials
XIT.TO
XEG.TO
-
Basic Materials
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Communication Services
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Energy
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
Healthcare
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Real Estate
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Utilities
XIT.TO
-
XEG.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIT.TO
XEG.TO
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIT.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.49 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 6.36 | -6.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 19.02 | -18.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIT.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 3.11 | -2.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 1.04 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.36 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.28 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and XEG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIT.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.18% | -87.74% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -11.12% | -20.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.93% | -25.67% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.15% | -28.42% | -25.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | -79.66% | +25.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -4.00% | -10.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -29.19% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.74% | 3.71% | +12.03% |
Volatility
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) at 9.31%. This indicates that XIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIT.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 9.31% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 18.99% | +5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.36% | 22.76% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 28.62% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 33.41% | -6.70% |
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIT.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 2.65% | 3.63% | 3.46% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 1.64% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 3.58% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIT.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XEG.TO.
XIT.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.61% for XEG.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and XEG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer