XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO
XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) and HBGD.TO (Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XIT.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index while HBGD.TO tracks the Solactive Big Data & Hardware Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XIT.TO returned 2.87%/yr vs 24.16%/yr for HBGD.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIT.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for HBGD.TO.
Performance
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -13.73% return, which is significantly lower than HBGD.TO's 43.70% return.
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -13.73%
- 1Y
- -6.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.98%
HBGD.TO
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- -18.34%
- 6M
- 23.47%
- YTD
- 43.70%
- 1Y
- 85.21%
- 3Y*
- 44.62%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 184.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$189.22K | CA$324.68K | CA$347.34K | |
| CA$932.35K | CA$850.30K | CA$1.09M |
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -13.73% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.74% | 45.91% | 60.84% | -13.94% |
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 43.70% | 53.48% | 15.92% | 129.66% | -56.87% | 59.75% | 555.62% | 323.86% | 4,068.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIT.TO and HBGD.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018 | 0.35 |
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIT.TO
HBGD.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XIT.TO
HBGD.TO
Financial Services
XIT.TO
HBGD.TO
Industrials
XIT.TO
HBGD.TO
-
Basic Materials
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
-
Communication Services
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
-
Energy
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
-
Healthcare
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
-
Real Estate
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
Utilities
XIT.TO
-
HBGD.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIT.TO
HBGD.TO
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIT.TO | HBGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.30 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.14 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 9.18 | -9.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, smaller than the maximum HBGD.TO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and HBGD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIT.TO | HBGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -99.95% | +43.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -27.30% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.93% | -38.68% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.15% | -63.43% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.99% | -71.01% | +48.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.01% | -86.16% | +69.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.17% | 9.33% | +7.84% |
Volatility
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) is 5.47%, while Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) has a volatility of 19.63%. This indicates that XIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIT.TO | HBGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 19.63% | -14.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.09% | 37.33% | -13.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.75% | 44.97% | -13.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 41.13% | -11.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 238,183.37% | -238,154.78% |
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HBGD.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIT.TO vs. HBGD.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 0.27% | 0.39% | 0.53% | 0.64% | 1.22% | 1.65% | 0.96% | 13.70% | 18.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIT.TO and HBGD.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for HBGD.TO.
XIT.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index, while HBGD.TO tracks Solactive Big Data & Hardware Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.64% for HBGD.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and HBGD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer