PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -13.73% return, which is significantly lower than FDN.TO's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO has outperformed FDN.TO with an annualized return of 16.43%, while FDN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.90% annualized return.


XIT.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-5.28%
YTD
-13.73%
1Y
-6.86%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
16.43%
ALL TIME*
11.98%

FDN.TO

1D
-1.94%
1M
1.51%
6M
3.84%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
1.40%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
2.90%
ALL TIME*
4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$76.24KCA$45.17KCA$23.22K
CA$932.35KCA$850.30KCA$1.09M

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF
-13.73%15.48%30.02%55.56%-35.85%10.74%45.91%60.84%11.71%17.09%
FDN.TO
First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF
0.50%5.45%41.28%49.01%-43.35%-5.63%6.27%15.99%-7.91%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XIT.TO and FDN.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.27

The correlation between XIT.TO and FDN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XIT.TO
FDN.TO

Technology

99.8%
45.2%

Financial Services

0.8%
1.9%

Industrials

0.2%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

25.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XIT.TO
99.8%
FDN.TO
45.2%

Financial Services

XIT.TO
0.8%
FDN.TO
1.9%

Industrials

XIT.TO
0.2%
FDN.TO
1.0%

Basic Materials

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO

-

Communication Services

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO
25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO

-

Energy

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO

-

Healthcare

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO
1.1%

Real Estate

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO

-

Utilities

XIT.TO

-

FDN.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIT.TO
XIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FDN.TO
FDN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FDN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIT.TOFDN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.04

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

0.09

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

0.21

-0.61

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the FDN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIT.TO and FDN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than FDN.TO's maximum drawdown of -50.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and FDN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIT.TOFDN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-50.44%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.93%

-21.40%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.93%

-26.31%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.15%

-50.39%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.15%

-50.44%

-3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.99%

-6.94%

-16.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-10.73%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.17%

9.47%

+7.70%

Volatility

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO) have volatilities of 5.47% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIT.TOFDN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

5.46%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.09%

16.62%

+7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.75%

20.17%

+11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.47%

26.14%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.59%

21.17%

+7.42%

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FDN.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIT.TO vs. FDN.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither XIT.TO nor FDN.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDN.TO
First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.65%5.69%1.47%1.40%1.76%1.51%1.50%
XIT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.34%0.00%0.15%0.18%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIT.TO and FDN.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for FDN.TO.

XIT.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index, while FDN.TO tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.66% for FDN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and FDN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer