XISE vs. HOCT
XISE (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. XISE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HOCT.
Performance
XISE vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XISE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XISE vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XISE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September | 2.45% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XISE vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
XISE
HOCT
XISE vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XISE | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.59 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XISE | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XISE vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XISE drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XISE and HOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XISE | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | 0.00% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | 0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility
XISE vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XISE | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 0.00% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 0.00% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 0.00% | +4.92% |
XISE vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XISE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
XISE vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
XISE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XISE FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September | 5.92% | 5.81% | 7.04% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XISE.
XISE has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XISE and 0.79% for HOCT.
Find the right allocation for XISE and HOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer