XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO
XINC.TO (iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio) and XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XINC.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares, while XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. XINC.TO is actively managed, while XIU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XINC.TO returned 3.19%/yr vs 14.66%/yr for XIU.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XINC.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XIU.TO.
Performance
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XINC.TO achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 11.56% return.
XINC.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 8.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- —
XIU.TO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 33.92%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XINC.TO iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio | 3.53% | 6.71% | 7.76% | 8.51% | -11.25% | 1.27% | 9.16% | 1.23% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 11.56% | 28.89% | 20.73% | 11.85% | -6.35% | 28.06% | 5.27% | 7.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XINC.TO and XIU.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019 | 0.38 |
The correlation between XINC.TO and XIU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (5 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Financial Services
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Industrials
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Energy
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Communication Services
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Basic Materials
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Healthcare
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Utilities
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Real Estate
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XINC.TO
XIU.TO
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XINC.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.52 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 4.45 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 20.69 | -12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XINC.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 2.89 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.15 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.51 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.40%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XINC.TO and XIU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XINC.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.40% | -52.31% | +36.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -7.65% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.36% | -12.36% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.40% | -16.36% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -11.62% | +7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 1.64% | -0.67% |
Volatility
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) is 1.92%, while iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that XINC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XINC.TO | XIU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 3.43% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | 9.39% | -5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.93% | 11.79% | -6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.42% | 12.79% | -6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 15.01% | -8.28% |
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XINC.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XIU.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XINC.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison
XINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than XIU.TO's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XINC.TO iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio | 3.19% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.87% | 2.54% | 2.02% | 2.40% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.17% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 3.16% | 3.02% | 2.43% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.18% | 2.58% | 2.65% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XINC.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XINC.TO.
XINC.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XINC.TO and 0.18% for XIU.TO.
Find the right allocation for XINC.TO and XIU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer