PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XINC.TO (iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio) and VGRO.TO (Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XINC.TO returned 3.17%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for VGRO.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) and Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XINC.TO achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than VGRO.TO's 10.34% return.

XINC.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.69%
YTD
3.43%
6M
3.01%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
—

VGRO.TO

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.15%
YTD
10.34%
6M
9.39%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio		3.43%6.71%7.76%8.51%-11.25%1.27%9.16%1.23%
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio		10.34%16.11%19.27%14.79%-11.21%14.79%10.85%7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XINC.TO and VGRO.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019

0.46

Over the past year, XINC.TO and VGRO.TO have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XINC.TO
VGRO.TO

Technology

4.8%
20.3%

Financial Services

4.3%
20.6%

Industrials

1.9%
11.6%

Energy

1.5%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
7.8%

Communication Services

1.3%
6.0%

Basic Materials

1.3%
8.6%

Healthcare

1.2%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.6%

Utilities

0.5%
2.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.3%

Technology

XINC.TO
4.8%
VGRO.TO
20.3%

Financial Services

XINC.TO
4.3%
VGRO.TO
20.6%

Industrials

XINC.TO
1.9%
VGRO.TO
11.6%

Energy

XINC.TO
1.5%
VGRO.TO
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XINC.TO
1.4%
VGRO.TO
7.8%

Communication Services

XINC.TO
1.3%
VGRO.TO
6.0%

Basic Materials

XINC.TO
1.3%
VGRO.TO
8.6%

Healthcare

XINC.TO
1.2%
VGRO.TO
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

XINC.TO
0.9%
VGRO.TO
4.6%

Utilities

XINC.TO
0.5%
VGRO.TO
2.8%

Real Estate

XINC.TO
0.3%
VGRO.TO
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio

Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio

Often compared with XINC.TO:
XINC.TO vs. XCNS.TOXINC.TO vs. VFV.TOXINC.TO vs. XEQT.TOXINC.TO vs. XGRO.TOXINC.TO vs. XSUS.TOXINC.TO vs. ZMMK.TOXINC.TO vs. XBAL.TO
Often compared with VGRO.TO:
VGRO.TO vs. VEQT.TOVGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOVGRO.TO vs. VBAL.TOVGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TOVGRO.TO vs. VDY.TOVGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOVGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TO

Return for Risk

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XINC.TO
XINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO
VGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) and Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XINC.TOVGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.68
2.57

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.44
3.61

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.54

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

15.41

-6.86

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XINC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the VGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XINC.TO and VGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XINC.TOVGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.57

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.03

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Drawdowns

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.40%, smaller than the maximum VGRO.TO drawdown of -25.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XINC.TO and VGRO.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XINC.TOVGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.40%

-25.36%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-7.01%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.36%

-12.50%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.40%

-17.39%

+1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.53%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-3.41%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.60%

-0.63%

Volatility

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) is 2.00%, while Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that XINC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XINC.TOVGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

3.18%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

7.86%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

9.62%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.43%

10.64%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

12.54%

-5.81%

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XINC.TO and VGRO.TO have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XINC.TO vs. VGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

XINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than VGRO.TO's 1.71% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio		1.71%1.88%2.01%2.13%2.14%1.80%1.77%2.17%2.09%
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio		3.19%3.16%2.81%2.87%2.54%2.02%2.40%0.93%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XINC.TO and VGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XINC.TO and VGRO.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XINC.TO and VGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer