PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

XIN.TO (iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XIN.TO is passively managed, while ONEQ.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIN.TO returned 10.35%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for ONEQ.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIN.TO achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ.TO's 13.96% return. Over the past 10 years, XIN.TO has underperformed ONEQ.TO with an annualized return of 10.35%, while ONEQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.

XIN.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.03%
6M
6.32%
YTD
11.24%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
10.35%

ONEQ.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
0.37%
6M
9.99%
YTD
13.96%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		11.24%20.30%10.20%18.55%-6.09%18.49%-0.36%22.63%-10.94%15.80%
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF		13.96%17.62%22.45%19.07%-10.74%21.65%8.21%22.22%-10.36%13.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XIN.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2015

0.37

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XIN.TO
ONEQ.TO

Financial Services

23.6%
14.3%

Industrials

16.1%
9.8%

Technology

12.8%
30.9%

Healthcare

9.7%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.7%
6.0%

Communication Services

3.3%
6.5%

Utilities

3.1%
2.1%

Energy

2.8%
9.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
3.0%

Financial Services

XIN.TO
23.6%
ONEQ.TO
14.3%

Industrials

XIN.TO
16.1%
ONEQ.TO
9.8%

Technology

XIN.TO
12.8%
ONEQ.TO
30.9%

Healthcare

XIN.TO
9.7%
ONEQ.TO
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XIN.TO
7.0%
ONEQ.TO
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

XIN.TO
6.5%
ONEQ.TO
5.2%

Basic Materials

XIN.TO
5.7%
ONEQ.TO
6.0%

Communication Services

XIN.TO
3.3%
ONEQ.TO
6.5%

Utilities

XIN.TO
3.1%
ONEQ.TO
2.1%

Energy

XIN.TO
2.8%
ONEQ.TO
9.8%

Real Estate

XIN.TO
1.5%
ONEQ.TO
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF

Often compared with XIN.TO:
XIN.TO vs. XEF.TOXIN.TO vs. XFH.TOXIN.TO vs. XWD.TOXIN.TO vs. XIU.TOXIN.TO vs. GBAL.TOXIN.TO vs. XUS-U.TOXIN.TO vs. XDW0.L
Often compared with ONEQ.TO:
ONEQ.TO vs. VDU.TOONEQ.TO vs. XML.TOONEQ.TO vs. VVO.TOONEQ.TO vs. ESGG.TOONEQ.TO vs. GEQT.TOONEQ.TO vs. VMO.TOONEQ.TO vs. CEQT.TO

Return for Risk

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIN.TO
XIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO
ONEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XIN.TOONEQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.71
2.11

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.41
3.08

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.80

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

16.75

-7.19

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIN.TO and ONEQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than ONEQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIN.TO and ONEQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XIN.TOONEQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-34.40%

-24.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-6.66%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-16.08%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

-17.61%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-34.40%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-1.20%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-3.69%

-10.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.51%

+0.87%

Volatility

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) at 2.83%. This indicates that XIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XIN.TOONEQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

2.83%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

9.93%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

12.03%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

13.29%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

13.91%

+1.98%

Dividends

XIN.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than ONEQ.TO's 1.60% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF		1.60%1.60%1.05%1.53%1.38%0.89%1.22%1.39%0.94%1.03%1.22%0.00%
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.79%2.90%2.69%2.51%2.18%2.65%1.81%2.58%2.87%2.15%2.39%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

XIN.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIN.TO and ONEQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer