PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XIN.TO (iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and FCIN.NEO (Fidelity All-International Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. XIN.TO is passively managed, while FCIN.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, XIN.TO returned 24.10% vs 25.67% for FCIN.NEO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIN.TO achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than FCIN.NEO's 13.63% return.

XIN.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.80%
6M
10.74%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
11.13%

FCIN.NEO

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
13.63%
6M
13.28%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		10.80%20.30%7.23%
FCIN.NEO
Fidelity All-International Equity ETF		13.63%27.93%11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XIN.TO and FCIN.NEO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2024

0.75

The correlation between XIN.TO and FCIN.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XIN.TO
FCIN.NEO

Financial Services

23.7%
27.9%

Industrials

16.3%
16.5%

Technology

12.6%
11.0%

Healthcare

9.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
6.6%

Basic Materials

5.9%
2.9%

Communication Services

3.8%
8.3%

Utilities

3.1%
5.3%

Energy

2.9%
5.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
4.5%

Financial Services

XIN.TO
23.7%
FCIN.NEO
27.9%

Industrials

XIN.TO
16.3%
FCIN.NEO
16.5%

Technology

XIN.TO
12.6%
FCIN.NEO
11.0%

Healthcare

XIN.TO
9.1%
FCIN.NEO
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XIN.TO
7.2%
FCIN.NEO
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

XIN.TO
6.6%
FCIN.NEO
6.6%

Basic Materials

XIN.TO
5.9%
FCIN.NEO
2.9%

Communication Services

XIN.TO
3.8%
FCIN.NEO
8.3%

Utilities

XIN.TO
3.1%
FCIN.NEO
5.3%

Energy

XIN.TO
2.9%
FCIN.NEO
5.7%

Real Estate

XIN.TO
1.5%
FCIN.NEO
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Fidelity All-International Equity ETF

Often compared with XIN.TO:
XIN.TO vs. XEF.TOXIN.TO vs. XFH.TOXIN.TO vs. XWD.TOXIN.TO vs. XIU.TOXIN.TO vs. GBAL.TOXIN.TO vs. XUS-U.TOXIN.TO vs. XDW0.L
Often compared with FCIN.NEO:
FCIN.NEO vs. FCID.TOFCIN.NEO vs. XMY.TOFCIN.NEO vs. BGIE.TOFCIN.NEO vs. MEQT.TOFCIN.NEO vs. TINF.TOFCIN.NEO vs. CYH.TOFCIN.NEO vs. FBTC.TO

Return for Risk

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIN.TO
XIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO
FCIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XIN.TOFCIN.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.82
1.85

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.57
2.59

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.70

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

10.49

-0.26

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIN.TO and FCIN.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than FCIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIN.TO and FCIN.NEO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XIN.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-12.34%

-46.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-9.56%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-1.75%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-1.54%

-12.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.45%

-0.09%

Volatility

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XIN.TOFCIN.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.45%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

11.95%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

13.93%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

14.36%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

14.36%

+1.59%

Dividends

XIN.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than FCIN.NEO's 1.12% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCIN.NEO
Fidelity All-International Equity ETF		1.12%1.28%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIN.TO
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.62%2.90%2.69%2.51%2.18%2.65%1.81%2.58%2.87%2.15%2.39%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

XIN.TO and FCIN.NEO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIN.TO and FCIN.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer