PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIMR vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIMR vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIMR achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 7.92% return.


XIMR

1D
0.03%
1M
0.55%
6M
4.69%
YTD
5.08%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.48%

XLRI

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.85%
6M
6.33%
YTD
7.92%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.36K$59.15K$78.16K
$67.65K$68.45K$64.14K

XIMR vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XIMR and XLRI is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIMR vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XIMR
XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XIMR vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIMRXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.19

1.17

+1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.35

1.42

+5.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.91

4.95

+52.96

XIMR vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIMR and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIMR vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIMR drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, smaller than the maximum XLRI drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIMR and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIMRXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-7.12%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

-7.12%

+6.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.11%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-1.54%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

2.03%

-1.89%

Volatility

XIMR vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) is 0.48%, while State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that XIMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIMRXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

3.34%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

8.74%

-6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

11.02%

-8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

11.10%

-6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

11.10%

-6.85%

XIMR vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIMR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIMR vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than XLRI's 14.37% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XIMR and XLRI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLRI has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to XIMR (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIMR dropped -5.12% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, XLRI leads with 10.04% vs 7.93% for XIMR. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XIMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLRI has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XIMR.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 14.37%, compared with 6.63% for XIMR.

XIMR is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIMR and 0.35% for XLRI.

XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIMR and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer