XIMR vs. GJUN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XIMR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March) and GJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June) are both Options Trading funds from FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XIMR returned 7.87% vs 10.23% for GJUN. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

XIMR vs. GJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIMR achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly higher than GJUN's 3.11% return.

XIMR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.33%
• 1Y: 7.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GJUN

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 10.23%
• 3Y*: 11.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIMR vs. GJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March	4.15%	6.80%	5.75%
GJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June	3.11%	10.00%	8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XIMR and GJUN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.63

The correlation between XIMR and GJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XIMR vs. GJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIMR

XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 97
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

GJUN

GJUN Risk / Return Rank: 84
GJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIMR vs. GJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XIMR	GJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.87	2.33	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.00	3.63	+3.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.20	1.51	+0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.29	3.46	+3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	59.00	19.75	+39.25

XIMR vs. GJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the GJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIMR and GJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XIMR vs. GJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIMR drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, smaller than the maximum GJUN drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIMR and GJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIMR	GJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-10.97%	+5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.08%	-2.97%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.85%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-0.87%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.52%	-0.39%

Volatility

XIMR vs. GJUN - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) have volatilities of 0.79% and 0.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIMR	GJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	0.78%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.79%	3.34%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08%	4.42%	-2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.34%	7.83%	-3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.34%	7.83%	-3.49%

XIMR vs. GJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XIMR and GJUN have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

XIMR vs. GJUN - Dividend Comparison

XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, while GJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March	6.43%	6.41%	4.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XIMR and GJUN in my portfolio?

XIMR and GJUN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XIMR or GJUN?

XIMR has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to GJUN (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIMR dropped -5.12% vs GJUN's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, XIMR or GJUN?

On 1-year performance, GJUN leads with 10.23% vs 7.87% for XIMR. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XIMR or GJUN?

Over the 1-year period, GJUN has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XIMR or GJUN?

XIMR and GJUN have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XIMR or GJUN?

XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.00% for GJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.