XIMR vs. APRQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XIMR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March) and APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. XIMR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRQ.

Performance

XIMR vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XIMR

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 4.33%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 8.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIMR vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March	3.90%
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%

Return for Risk

XIMR vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIMR

XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 97
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIMR vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XIMR	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	68.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XIMR	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	—	—

Drawdowns

XIMR vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIMR drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIMR and APRQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIMR	APRQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	0.00%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XIMR	APRQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02%	0.00%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.36%	0.00%	+4.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.36%	0.00%	+4.36%

XIMR vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIMR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIMR vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, while APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March	6.42%	6.41%	4.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XIMR or APRQ?

On fees, APRQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XIMR or APRQ?

APRQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XIMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XIMR or APRQ?

XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.

What is the main difference between XIMR and APRQ?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XIMR and 0.79% for APRQ.