PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XID.TO vs. XEI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares India Index ETF (XID.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XID.TO achieves a -14.17% return, which is significantly lower than XEI.TO's 22.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XID.TO has underperformed XEI.TO with an annualized return of 6.69%, while XEI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.


XID.TO

1D
-0.95%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
-14.17%
6M
-14.49%
1Y
-13.67%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
6.69%

XEI.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.33%
YTD
22.21%
6M
23.56%
1Y
43.59%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
-14.17%-0.28%12.36%14.07%-0.64%17.51%7.86%4.33%3.73%26.87%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
22.21%25.96%15.42%6.69%0.41%35.88%-7.53%25.44%-10.85%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XID.TO and XEI.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between XID.TO and XEI.TO has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XID.TO
XEI.TO

Financial Services

35.4%
31.4%

Energy

11.3%
32.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
6.2%

Technology

8.5%
0.7%

Industrials

7.7%
0.7%

Basic Materials

7.3%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
0.5%

Communication Services

5.2%
7.6%

Healthcare

4.5%
0.2%

Utilities

3.0%
11.2%

Real Estate

-

4.8%

Financial Services

XID.TO
35.4%
XEI.TO
31.4%

Energy

XID.TO
11.3%
XEI.TO
32.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XID.TO
10.8%
XEI.TO
6.2%

Technology

XID.TO
8.5%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Industrials

XID.TO
7.7%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Basic Materials

XID.TO
7.3%
XEI.TO
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

XID.TO
6.2%
XEI.TO
0.5%

Communication Services

XID.TO
5.2%
XEI.TO
7.6%

Healthcare

XID.TO
4.5%
XEI.TO
0.2%

Utilities

XID.TO
3.0%
XEI.TO
11.2%

Real Estate

XID.TO

-

XEI.TO
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XID.TO
XID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
XID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
XID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
XID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

XEI.TO
XEI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares India Index ETF (XID.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XID.TOXEI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

2.27

-1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

19.53

-20.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.60

66.28

-67.88

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XID.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XID.TO and XEI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XID.TOXEI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

6.08

-7.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

1.39

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.77

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.67

-0.34

Drawdowns

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XID.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, smaller than the maximum XEI.TO drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XID.TO and XEI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XID.TOXEI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.26%

-45.51%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.75%

-2.24%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-9.92%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-17.32%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.46%

-45.51%

+6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.69%

-0.76%

-17.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.43%

-5.05%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.57%

0.66%

+7.91%

Volatility

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares India Index ETF (XID.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) at 2.87%. This indicates that XID.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XID.TOXEI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

2.87%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

6.01%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

7.21%

+7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

11.24%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

16.01%

+2.21%

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XID.TO has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

XID.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison

XID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.69%, more than XEI.TO's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
3.56%4.39%5.56%5.08%4.78%3.65%5.13%4.71%5.53%4.37%4.51%5.75%
XID.TO
iShares India Index ETF
16.69%14.32%0.17%0.42%3.45%6.82%0.03%0.43%0.39%0.16%0.36%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


XID.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for XID.TO.

XID.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XEI.TO is Canada Equities. XID.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for XID.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XID.TO and XEI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer