PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than PSA.TO's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO has outperformed PSA.TO with an annualized return of 12.48%, while PSA.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.25% annualized return.


XIC.TO

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.59%
YTD
10.75%
6M
12.90%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
12.48%

PSA.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.08%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
2.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
10.75%31.51%21.48%11.73%-5.82%23.42%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
0.89%2.64%4.56%5.12%2.34%0.60%0.93%2.22%1.65%1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XIC.TO and PSA.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PSA.TO
PSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIC.TOPSA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-24.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

6.27

-4.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

117.76

-114.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.44

422.79

-405.35

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is lower than the PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 10.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIC.TO and PSA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIC.TOPSA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

10.34

-7.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

11.66

-10.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

9.68

-8.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

9.26

-8.72

Drawdowns

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.21%, which is greater than PSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and PSA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIC.TOPSA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.21%

-0.04%

-48.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-0.02%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-0.02%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-0.04%

-16.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

-0.04%

-37.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

0.00%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-0.00%

-7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

0.01%

+1.99%

Volatility

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that XIC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIC.TOPSA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

0.06%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

0.16%

+10.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

0.23%

+12.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

0.27%

+12.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

0.24%

+14.72%

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PSA.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XIC.TO vs. PSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than PSA.TO's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
2.33%2.61%4.47%5.05%2.26%0.59%0.94%2.18%1.66%1.07%0.99%1.07%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.02%2.23%2.64%2.95%3.10%2.44%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIC.TO and PSA.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for PSA.TO.

XIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PSA.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XIC.TO and 0.17% for PSA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIC.TO and PSA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer