PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than HISA.NEO's 1.19% return.


XIC.TO

1D
-0.76%
1M
0.04%
6M
10.65%
YTD
12.55%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
12.41%
ALL TIME*
9.28%

HISA.NEO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
6M
1.06%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$99.59MCA$46.46MCA$52.98M
CA$23.72MCA$28.51MCA$27.00M

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
12.55%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%23.43%5.61%0.69%
HISA.NEO
Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF
1.19%2.54%4.58%5.11%2.35%0.57%0.88%0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XIC.TO and HISA.NEO is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2019

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HISA.NEO
HISA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HISA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIC.TOHISA.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

5.42

-3.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

12.40

-8.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

102.56

-86.86

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is lower than the HISA.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIC.TO and HISA.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.27%, which is greater than HISA.NEO's maximum drawdown of -0.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and HISA.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIC.TOHISA.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.27%

-0.22%

-47.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-0.18%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-0.22%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-0.22%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

0.00%

-6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.02%

+2.03%

Volatility

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO) at 0.05%. This indicates that XIC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISA.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIC.TOHISA.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

0.05%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

0.29%

+10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.34%

0.42%

+12.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

0.34%

+12.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

0.39%

+14.57%

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than HISA.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XIC.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Dividend Comparison

XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than HISA.NEO's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HISA.NEO
Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF
2.18%2.53%4.43%5.03%2.28%0.57%0.90%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.00%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIC.TO and HISA.NEO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HISA.NEO.

XIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while HISA.NEO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XIC.TO and 0.15% for HISA.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIC.TO and HISA.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer