PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIC.TO vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XIC.TO is traded in CAD, while AIRR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIRR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 32.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO has underperformed AIRR with an annualized return of 12.53%, while AIRR has yielded a comparatively higher 22.72% annualized return.


XIC.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
1.36%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.86%
1Y
33.59%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
12.53%

AIRR

1D
0.37%
1M
0.88%
YTD
32.74%
6M
30.30%
1Y
64.89%
3Y*
37.34%
5Y*
28.51%
10Y*
22.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
9.79%31.51%21.48%11.74%-5.82%23.43%5.61%22.76%-8.72%8.99%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
32.78%22.08%44.75%28.31%4.12%32.95%14.39%28.45%-13.89%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XIC.TO and AIRR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.61

The correlation between XIC.TO and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XIC.TO
AIRR

Financial Services

33.8%
9.6%

Basic Materials

17.7%

-

Energy

17.3%
3.8%

Industrials

10.2%
84.6%

Technology

7.1%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Financial Services

XIC.TO
33.8%
AIRR
9.6%

Basic Materials

XIC.TO
17.7%
AIRR

-

Energy

XIC.TO
17.3%
AIRR
3.8%

Industrials

XIC.TO
10.2%
AIRR
84.6%

Technology

XIC.TO
7.1%
AIRR
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XIC.TO
3.8%
AIRR

-

Consumer Defensive

XIC.TO
2.8%
AIRR

-

Utilities

XIC.TO
2.8%
AIRR

-

Communication Services

XIC.TO
1.8%
AIRR

-

Real Estate

XIC.TO
1.5%
AIRR

-

Healthcare

XIC.TO
0.1%
AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIC.TO vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIC.TOAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

5.56

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.76

19.29

-2.53

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIC.TO and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIC.TOAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.51

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

1.10

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.85

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.73

-0.17

Drawdowns

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.27%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -37.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIC.TOAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.27%

-37.96%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-11.74%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.27%

-27.05%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.24%

-27.05%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

-37.96%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-2.45%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-6.53%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.38%

-1.37%

Volatility

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) is 4.28%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that XIC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIC.TOAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

7.36%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

20.64%

-10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

26.05%

-13.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

26.00%

-12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

26.96%

-11.98%

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIC.TO vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than AIRR's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.14%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.04%2.23%2.64%2.96%3.10%2.45%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIC.TO and AIRR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

XIC.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XIC.TO and 0.69% for AIRR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIC.TO and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer