PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYH vs. JPHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYH vs. JPHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYH achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than JPHY's 2.06% return.


XHYH

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.15%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
10Y*

JPHY

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.35%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYH vs. JPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XHYH and JPHY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.45

XHYH vs. JPHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHYH
JPHY

Healthcare

64.7%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
8.9%

Technology

0.3%
4.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.6%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Energy

-

7.0%

Financial Services

-

1.8%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Healthcare

XHYH
64.7%
JPHY
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XHYH
3.8%
JPHY
8.9%

Technology

XHYH
0.3%
JPHY
4.8%

Basic Materials

XHYH

-

JPHY
3.6%

Communication Services

XHYH

-

JPHY
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

XHYH

-

JPHY
2.4%

Energy

XHYH

-

JPHY
7.0%

Financial Services

XHYH

-

JPHY
1.8%

Industrials

XHYH

-

JPHY
10.8%

Real Estate

XHYH

-

JPHY
3.0%

Utilities

XHYH

-

JPHY
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYH vs. JPHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYH
XHYH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XHYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

JPHY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYH vs. JPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYHJPHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

XHYH vs. JPHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYHJPHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

2.16

-1.63

Drawdowns

XHYH vs. JPHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYH drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than JPHY's maximum drawdown of -1.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYH and JPHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYHJPHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.84%

-1.65%

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.10%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-0.21%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

Volatility

XHYH vs. JPHY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYHJPHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

3.04%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.55%

3.04%

+5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.55%

3.04%

+5.51%

XHYH vs. JPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JPHY's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHYH vs. JPHY - Dividend Comparison

XHYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than JPHY's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JPHY
JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF
5.92%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHYH
BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF
6.58%6.95%6.95%7.73%6.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYH and JPHY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYH.

XHYH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 5.92% for JPHY.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYH and 0.24% for JPHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYH and JPHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer