XHYF vs. DADS
XHYF (BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. XHYF is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHYF charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
XHYF vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYF achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.38% return.
XHYF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHYF vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XHYF BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF | -0.10% | 3.02% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.38% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYF and DADS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYF vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
XHYF
DADS
XHYF vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYF | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYF | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
XHYF vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYF drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum DADS drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYF and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYF | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -17.07% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -2.77% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -7.61% | +5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
XHYF vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYF | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 17.54% | -14.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 17.54% | -10.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 17.54% | -10.40% |
XHYF vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYF vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
XHYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHYF BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF | 6.27% | 6.73% | 7.11% | 7.00% | 5.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYF and DADS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHYF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHYF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
XHYF has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYF and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for XHYF and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer