XHYD vs. DADS
XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. XHYD is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHYD charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
XHYD vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.37% return.
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHYD vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 3.12% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.37% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYD and DADS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYD vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
XHYD
DADS
XHYD vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYD | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYD | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.73 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
XHYD vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum DADS drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYD | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -17.07% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -2.77% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -7.63% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | — | — |
Volatility
XHYD vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYD | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 17.58% | -13.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 17.58% | -10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 17.58% | -10.43% |
XHYD vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYD vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
XHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYD and DADS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHYD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHYD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
XHYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYD and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for XHYD and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer