PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYD vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYD vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than AGNC's 1.46% return.


XHYD

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.86%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
10Y*

AGNC

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.91%
YTD
1.46%
6M
4.85%
1Y
30.97%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYD vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHYD
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF
0.44%8.33%6.29%11.75%-5.80%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
1.46%34.92%8.90%10.14%-13.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYD and AGNC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between XHYD and AGNC has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYD vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYD
XHYD Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYD vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYDAGNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.66

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

5.00

+5.53

XHYD vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYD and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYDAGNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.43

+0.24

Drawdowns

XHYD vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum AGNC drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYDAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-54.56%

+43.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-18.71%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-31.04%

+27.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-10.63%

+9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-13.56%

+11.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

6.20%

-5.64%

Volatility

XHYD vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) is 1.83%, while AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYDAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

4.90%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

15.90%

-12.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

19.31%

-15.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

25.82%

-18.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

25.38%

-18.23%

Dividends

XHYD vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

XHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than AGNC's 13.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.99%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
XHYD
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF
5.31%5.83%6.32%5.80%5.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYD and AGNC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGNC has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYD and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer