PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYC vs. XONE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XHYC vs. XONE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XHYC vs. XONE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHYC
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF
-0.18%6.80%7.99%15.00%-0.31%
XONE
Bondbloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.58%4.41%4.83%4.74%0.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYC achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than XONE's 0.58% return.


XHYC

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
1.02%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
10Y*

XONE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.58%
6M
1.58%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XHYC vs. XONE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XONE's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XHYC vs. XONE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYC
XHYC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XHYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XONE
XONE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XONE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XONE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYC vs. XONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYCXONEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

6.31

-4.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

13.53

-11.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

3.03

-1.70

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

19.73

-18.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.21

88.12

-79.92

XHYC vs. XONE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYC Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the XONE Sharpe Ratio of 6.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYC and XONE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYCXONEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

6.31

-4.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

4.94

-4.32

Correlation

The correlation between XHYC and XONE is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XHYC vs. XONE - Dividend Comparison

XHYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than XONE's 4.16% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
XHYC
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF
6.82%6.64%6.71%6.48%5.78%
XONE
Bondbloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.16%4.33%5.21%4.46%1.17%

Drawdowns

XHYC vs. XONE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYC drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, which is greater than XONE's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYC and XONE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYCXONEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-0.40%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-0.20%

-3.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.01%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-0.05%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.04%

+0.75%

Volatility

XHYC vs. XONE - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYC) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Bondbloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) at 0.21%. This indicates that XHYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XHYCXONEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

0.21%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

0.34%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

0.61%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

0.87%

+6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

0.87%

+6.68%