PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XHU.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF) and XMS.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - XHU.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while XMS.TO tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHU.TO returned 7.81%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for XMS.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHU.TO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for XMS.TO.

Performance

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHU.TO achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than XMS.TO's 1.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XHU.TO having a 7.81% annualized return and XMS.TO not far ahead at 7.82%.

XHU.TO

1D
0.36%
1M
2.43%
YTD
14.37%
6M
5.83%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
7.81%

XMS.TO

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.18%
YTD
1.17%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
0.21%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHU.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF		14.37%-0.28%16.64%-1.52%12.37%18.23%-9.27%13.08%3.95%5.12%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.17%3.71%14.23%7.84%-11.15%21.02%1.81%26.70%-1.63%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XHU.TO and XMS.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2016

0.42

The correlation between XHU.TO and XMS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XHU.TO
XMS.TO

Consumer Defensive

24.1%
9.9%

Energy

21.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

16.8%
12.7%

Financial Services

10.8%
14.0%

Technology

9.0%
29.8%

Utilities

8.9%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
6.2%

Industrials

2.0%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.1%

Communication Services

0.1%
5.9%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

XHU.TO
24.1%
XMS.TO
9.9%

Energy

XHU.TO
21.2%
XMS.TO
3.5%

Healthcare

XHU.TO
16.8%
XMS.TO
12.7%

Financial Services

XHU.TO
10.8%
XMS.TO
14.0%

Technology

XHU.TO
9.0%
XMS.TO
29.8%

Utilities

XHU.TO
8.9%
XMS.TO
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XHU.TO
5.8%
XMS.TO
6.2%

Industrials

XHU.TO
2.0%
XMS.TO
6.2%

Basic Materials

XHU.TO
1.1%
XMS.TO
2.1%

Communication Services

XHU.TO
0.1%
XMS.TO
5.9%

Real Estate

XHU.TO

-

XMS.TO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XHU.TO:
XHU.TO vs. CUD.TOXHU.TO vs. SCHDXHU.TO vs. VDY.TOXHU.TO vs. XEI.TOXHU.TO vs. XEQT.TOXHU.TO vs. DGROXHU.TO vs. XUS.TO
Often compared with XMS.TO:
XMS.TO vs. XMU.TOXMS.TO vs. VFV.TOXMS.TO vs. XDU.TOXMS.TO vs. VSP.TOXMS.TO vs. XUS.TOXMS.TO vs. SPYXMS.TO vs. ZSP.TO

Return for Risk

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XHU.TO
XHU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XHU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XHU.TOXMS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.32
0.01

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.72
0.07

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.01

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

0.01

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

0.03

+6.12

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHU.TO and XMS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XHU.TOXMS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.01

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.43

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.53

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.54

+0.01

Drawdowns

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, smaller than the maximum XMS.TO drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHU.TO and XMS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XHU.TOXMS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.94%

-36.48%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-6.91%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

-9.82%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.53%

-19.23%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.94%

-36.48%

+6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.73%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-4.26%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.54%

-0.03%

Volatility

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) at 2.35%. This indicates that XHU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XHU.TOXMS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.35%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

6.14%

+4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

8.75%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

12.11%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.74%

-0.36%

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHU.TO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XMS.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

XHU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than XMS.TO's 1.18% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XHU.TO
iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF		2.43%2.75%2.72%2.86%2.63%2.60%3.18%2.25%2.52%2.27%2.38%2.30%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.18%1.08%1.21%1.38%1.20%0.99%1.66%1.40%1.54%1.53%1.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XHU.TO and XMS.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMS.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMS.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for XHU.TO.

XHU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while XMS.TO tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XHU.TO and 0.33% for XMS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHU.TO and XMS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer