PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian HYBrid Corporate Bond Index ETF (XHB.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHB.TO achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XHB.TO has outperformed ZAG.TO with an annualized return of 5.63%, while ZAG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.66% annualized return.


XHB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.76%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.20%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
5.63%

ZAG.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.75%
YTD
1.70%
6M
0.89%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHB.TO
iShares Canadian HYBrid Corporate Bond Index ETF
2.17%5.34%11.53%14.52%-6.53%2.10%11.03%10.73%0.59%4.49%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.70%2.25%4.48%6.41%-11.60%-2.60%8.34%6.84%1.12%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XHB.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2010

0.51

Over the past year, XHB.TO and ZAG.TO have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHB.TO
XHB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XHB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XHB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian HYBrid Corporate Bond Index ETF (XHB.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHB.TOZAG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.17

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

2.73

+5.35

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHB.TO and ZAG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHB.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.73

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.12

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.23

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.45

+0.13

Drawdowns

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHB.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.03%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHB.TO and ZAG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHB.TOZAG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.03%

-18.03%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-2.79%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.42%

-5.42%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.83%

-15.77%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.03%

-18.03%

-8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.09%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-3.54%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

1.19%

-0.46%

Volatility

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian HYBrid Corporate Bond Index ETF (XHB.TO) is 1.17%, while BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that XHB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHB.TOZAG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

1.68%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

3.43%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32%

4.46%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.61%

6.58%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.05%

7.11%

+3.94%

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHB.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAG.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHB.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XHB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than ZAG.TO's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XHB.TO
iShares Canadian HYBrid Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.52%4.48%7.49%8.06%7.74%5.57%5.47%5.75%4.07%4.08%4.35%4.78%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.42%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHB.TO and ZAG.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XHB.TO.

XHB.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ZAG.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. XHB.TO tracks Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD, while ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XHB.TO and 0.09% for ZAG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHB.TO and ZAG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer