PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGSD.L is traded in GBp, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGSD.L achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 15.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XGSD.L has underperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of 9.12%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.


XGSD.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.62%
6M
12.11%
YTD
14.55%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
9.12%

UTIL.L

1D
-1.19%
1M
1.62%
6M
12.62%
YTD
15.87%
1Y
30.25%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
14.55%25.51%9.10%2.83%4.27%14.85%-3.40%16.23%-5.61%7.01%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
15.87%41.15%-3.27%10.84%-1.95%1.85%18.14%21.98%4.38%13.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XGSD.L and UTIL.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.53

The correlation between XGSD.L and UTIL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XGSD.L
UTIL.L

Financial Services

40.5%

-

Industrials

9.3%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Energy

8.1%

-

Real Estate

6.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.8%

-

Utilities

6.5%
95.3%

Basic Materials

6.1%

-

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Technology

2.2%

-

Healthcare

1.9%

-

Financial Services

XGSD.L
40.5%
UTIL.L

-

Industrials

XGSD.L
9.3%
UTIL.L
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XGSD.L
8.7%
UTIL.L

-

Energy

XGSD.L
8.1%
UTIL.L

-

Real Estate

XGSD.L
6.9%
UTIL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XGSD.L
6.8%
UTIL.L

-

Utilities

XGSD.L
6.5%
UTIL.L
95.3%

Basic Materials

XGSD.L
6.1%
UTIL.L

-

Communication Services

XGSD.L
3.1%
UTIL.L

-

Technology

XGSD.L
2.2%
UTIL.L

-

Healthcare

XGSD.L
1.9%
UTIL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGSD.L
XGSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGSD.LUTIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.34

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.24

3.51

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.98

9.63

+13.35

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGSD.L and UTIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGSD.L drawdown since its inception was -63.91%, which is greater than UTIL.L's maximum drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSD.L and UTIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGSD.LUTIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.91%

-28.73%

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.76%

-8.58%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

-12.37%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.37%

-19.90%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.91%

-28.73%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-2.60%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-5.68%

-6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

3.13%

-1.83%

Volatility

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) is 1.97%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that XGSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGSD.LUTIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

4.66%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

13.25%

-6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

15.49%

-6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.38%

16.37%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

17.65%

-3.73%

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGSD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGSD.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison

XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while UTIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
4.09%4.60%6.38%7.52%8.71%4.76%5.34%4.30%4.68%3.56%2.74%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGSD.L and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XGSD.L.

XGSD.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while UTIL.L is Utilities Equities. XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100, while UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XGSD.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGSD.L and UTIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer