XGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO).
XGRO.TO and VDY.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007. VDY.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XGRO.TO or VDY.TO.
Key characteristics
| XGRO.TO | VDY.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.57% | 21.48% |
| 1Y Return | 27.44% | 31.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.86% | 10.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.71% | 12.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.32% | 8.94% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.37 | 3.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.85 | 4.85 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.64 | 1.65 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.78 | 3.11 |
| Martin Ratio | 27.27 | 18.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.99% | 1.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.97% | 9.29% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.93% | -39.21% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGRO.TO and VDY.TO is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XGRO.TO achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly lower than VDY.TO's 21.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XGRO.TO has underperformed VDY.TO with an annualized return of 8.32%, while VDY.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGRO.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VDY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
XGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than VDY.TO's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 2.05% | 2.27% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 2.25% | 7.56% | 2.08% | 2.70% | 2.19% | 5.71% | 1.66% |
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 4.31% | 4.64% | 4.42% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.25% | 4.43% | 3.82% | 3.25% | 4.11% | 3.25% | 2.50% |
Drawdowns
XGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.93%, which is greater than VDY.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGRO.TO and VDY.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XGRO.TO vs. VDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.