XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE
XGLF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and VFEA.DE (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XGLF.DE tracks the MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index while VFEA.DE tracks the FTSE Emerging. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGLF.DE returned 5.07%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for VFEA.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGLF.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VFEA.DE.
Performance
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLF.DE achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than VFEA.DE's 10.01% return.
XGLF.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
VFEA.DE
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 19.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLF.DE Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 4.58% | -5.36% | 9.58% | 0.55% | 1.24% | 48.84% | -9.49% | 1.77% |
VFEA.DE Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc | 10.01% | 11.25% | 19.29% | 3.32% | -10.71% | 6.34% | 3.46% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLF.DE and VFEA.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGLF.DE
VFEA.DE
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGLF.DE | VFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 2.24 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | 7.04 | -6.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.15%, which is greater than VFEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLF.DE and VFEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLF.DE | VFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -30.51% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -8.44% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -18.97% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -19.98% | -11.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.93% | -5.70% | -13.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.25% | -8.65% | -9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 2.69% | +1.49% |
Volatility
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) is 3.12%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEA.DE) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that XGLF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLF.DE | VFEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 5.41% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 12.89% | -3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 15.79% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 15.89% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.51% | -0.18% |
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLF.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFEA.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLF.DE vs. VFEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLF.DE nor VFEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLF.DE and VFEA.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFEA.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.
XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index, while VFEA.DE tracks FTSE Emerging. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XGLF.DE and 0.22% for VFEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGLF.DE and VFEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer