XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L
XGLE.L (Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and IDTP.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XGLE.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while IDTP.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGLE.L returned -0.38%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for IDTP.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGLE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IDTP.L.
Performance
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGLE.L is traded in EUR, while IDTP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDTP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, XGLE.L has underperformed IDTP.L with an annualized return of -0.38%, while IDTP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 2.38% annualized return.
XGLE.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- -0.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.30%
- 10Y*
- -0.38%
IDTP.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 1.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLE.L Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C | -0.00% | 0.57% | 1.68% | 6.80% | -18.23% | -3.63% | 4.76% | 6.62% | 0.78% | -0.04% |
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.27% | -5.75% | 8.90% | 0.60% | -7.35% | 14.11% | 1.83% | 11.14% | 3.20% | -9.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLE.L and IDTP.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2009 | 0.25 |
The correlation between XGLE.L and IDTP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGLE.L
IDTP.L
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLE.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.08 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 0.63 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 1.64 | -1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLE.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 0.45 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.22 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.26 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.39 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLE.L drawdown since its inception was -22.56%, which is greater than IDTP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLE.L and IDTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLE.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.56% | -20.10% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.54% | -4.50% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.99% | -11.17% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | -15.25% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.56% | -16.11% | -6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.25% | -7.99% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -6.91% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 1.71% | -0.34% |
Volatility
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) at 1.02%. This indicates that XGLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLE.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.02% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.54% | 4.54% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 6.35% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.34% | 8.69% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 9.10% | -3.76% |
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IDTP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGLE.L vs. IDTP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLE.L nor IDTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLE.L and IDTP.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDTP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDTP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XGLE.L.
XGLE.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while IDTP.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while IDTP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XGLE.L and 0.12% for IDTP.L.
Find the right allocation for XGLE.L and IDTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer