PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) and Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGLE.L is traded in EUR, while GLT5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GLT5.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XGLE.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.30%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
-0.20%
3Y*
2.18%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*
-0.38%

GLT5.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.09%
6M
1.55%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.00%0.57%1.68%6.80%-18.23%-3.63%4.76%4.42%
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
1.09%-0.18%7.06%6.06%-10.31%4.49%-3.70%2.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XGLE.L and GLT5.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2019

0.33

The correlation between XGLE.L and GLT5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGLE.L
XGLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GLT5.L
GLT5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) and Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGLE.LGLT5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.01

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

0.07

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.15

0.13

-0.28

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGLE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGLE.L and GLT5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGLE.LGLT5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.04

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.12

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.11

+0.30

Drawdowns

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGLE.L drawdown since its inception was -22.56%, which is greater than GLT5.L's maximum drawdown of -16.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLE.L and GLT5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGLE.LGLT5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.56%

-16.01%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.54%

-2.87%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.99%

-4.58%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-15.49%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.25%

-0.77%

-13.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-4.59%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

1.51%

-0.14%

Volatility

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XGLE.L) is 1.72%, while Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that XGLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLT5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGLE.LGLT5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

2.38%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.54%

3.90%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

5.26%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.34%

6.54%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

7.29%

-1.95%

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLT5.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGLE.L vs. GLT5.L - Dividend Comparison

XGLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLT5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.13%4.12%4.43%3.76%1.01%0.19%0.33%0.44%
XGLE.L
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGLE.L and GLT5.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLT5.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLT5.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XGLE.L.

XGLE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while GLT5.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XGLE.L and 0.06% for GLT5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGLE.L and GLT5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer