XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XGDU.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.L returned 18.61%/yr vs 22.91%/yr for XSTC.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XGDU.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGDU.L achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.02% return.

XGDU.L

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -2.38%
• YTD: 3.77%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 32.35%
• 3Y*: 31.54%
• 5Y*: 18.61%
• 10Y*: —

XSTC.L

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: 13.80%
• YTD: 23.02%
• 6M: 22.95%
• 1Y: 51.90%
• 3Y*: 34.02%
• 5Y*: 22.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XGDU.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities	3.77%	64.71%	26.20%	13.45%	0.32%	-3.91%	9.83%
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D	23.02%	22.94%	37.18%	56.67%	-30.82%	32.26%	49.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XGDU.L and XSTC.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2020	0.10

Return for Risk

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGDU.L

XGDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
XGDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
XGDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
XGDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
XGDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XGDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

XSTC.L

XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGDU.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.57	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	3.37	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.42	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.95	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	8.80	-4.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGDU.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGDU.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	2.57	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	0.97	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.06	-0.06

Drawdowns

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGDU.L drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.L and XSTC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGDU.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.59%	-35.20%	+13.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.47%	-17.54%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.47%	-27.66%	+10.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.00%	-35.20%	+14.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.82%	-3.01%	-12.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.31%	-7.34%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.82%	5.88%	+0.94%

Volatility

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) is 6.39%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that XGDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGDU.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	7.06%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.85%	15.16%	+6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.87%	20.09%	+4.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	23.50%	-6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	23.43%	-6.12%

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XGDU.L and XSTC.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XGDU.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

XGDU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XGDU.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D	0.26%	0.33%	0.37%	0.53%	1.08%	0.53%	0.63%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XGDU.L and XSTC.L in my portfolio?

XGDU.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XGDU.L or XSTC.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XGDU.L or XSTC.L?

XGDU.L and XSTC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

What is the main difference between XGDU.L and XSTC.L?

XGDU.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XGDU.L tracks Gold, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.