PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF (XAD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGD.TO achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than XAD.TO's 6.26% return.


XGD.TO

1D
-2.80%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.35%
6M
8.72%
1Y
67.78%
3Y*
43.11%
5Y*
22.30%
10Y*
14.79%

XAD.TO

1D
-0.94%
1M
7.08%
YTD
6.26%
6M
11.49%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
3.35%144.45%19.63%4.42%
XAD.TO
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF
6.26%41.77%25.00%14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XGD.TO and XAD.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XAD.TO
XAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF (XAD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGD.TOXAD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.86

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

4.77

+1.45

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the XAD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGD.TO and XAD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGD.TOXAD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.34

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.84

-1.58

Drawdowns

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than XAD.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGD.TO and XAD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGD.TOXAD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.55%

-16.06%

-56.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.95%

-14.91%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.49%

-8.53%

-14.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.30%

-3.03%

-25.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.93%

5.80%

+5.13%

Volatility

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.43% compared to iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF (XAD.TO) at 6.64%. This indicates that XGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGD.TOXAD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

6.64%

+7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.40%

17.11%

+17.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.86%

20.72%

+22.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.64%

21.21%

+11.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.38%

21.21%

+12.17%

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGD.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XAD.TO's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGD.TO vs. XAD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than XAD.TO's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XAD.TO
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense Index ETF
0.33%0.35%0.44%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
0.60%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.80%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.09%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGD.TO and XAD.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAD.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAD.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XGD.TO.

XGD.TO is categorized as Precious Metals, while XAD.TO is Aerospace & Defense. XGD.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD, while XAD.TO tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XGD.TO and 0.44% for XAD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGD.TO and XAD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer