PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGD.TO vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGD.TO is traded in CAD, while VTV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VTV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGD.TO achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XGD.TO having a 14.21% annualized return and VTV not far behind at 13.75%.


XGD.TO

1D
2.99%
1M
-13.12%
YTD
-2.21%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
56.40%
3Y*
41.86%
5Y*
21.08%
10Y*
14.21%

VTV

1D
1.12%
1M
5.89%
YTD
16.61%
6M
15.61%
1Y
31.43%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
-2.21%144.45%19.63%3.91%-3.13%-5.81%21.10%40.18%-4.10%0.96%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
16.61%10.01%25.77%6.71%4.12%26.47%-0.10%20.48%2.47%9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XGD.TO and VTV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.11

The correlation between XGD.TO and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (10 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGD.TO vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGD.TOVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

5.21

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

19.15

-14.15

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGD.TO and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.56%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGD.TO and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGD.TOVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.56%

-52.38%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.06%

-5.74%

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.06%

-15.12%

-17.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-15.12%

-25.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.96%

-31.22%

-15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.60%

0.00%

-27.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-9.15%

-22.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

1.56%

+10.35%

Volatility

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.16% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.58%. This indicates that XGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGD.TOVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.16%

3.58%

+12.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.04%

8.63%

+27.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.26%

11.27%

+32.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.95%

15.09%

+17.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.55%

17.74%

+15.81%

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGD.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGD.TO vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than VTV's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
0.64%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.77%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.10%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGD.TO and VTV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XGD.TO.

XGD.TO is categorized as Gold, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. XGD.TO tracks S&P/TSX Global Gold Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XGD.TO and 0.04% for VTV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGD.TO and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer