PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XG7U.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XG7U.L achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.02% return.


XG7U.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.45%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
2.09%

XSTC.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
13.80%
YTD
23.02%
6M
22.95%
1Y
51.90%
3Y*
34.02%
5Y*
22.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XG7U.L
Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged
1.52%4.67%-0.45%4.13%-17.08%5.31%9.30%8.31%1.45%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
23.02%22.94%37.18%56.67%-30.82%32.26%45.87%48.94%-5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XG7U.L and XSTC.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XG7U.L
XG7U.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XG7U.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.95

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

8.80

-3.95

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XG7U.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XG7U.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

2.57

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.97

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.06

-0.73

Drawdowns

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XG7U.L drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XG7U.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XG7U.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.33%

-35.20%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-17.54%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

-27.66%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

-35.20%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.40%

-3.01%

-7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-7.34%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

5.88%

-5.00%

Volatility

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) is 1.51%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that XG7U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XG7U.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

7.06%

-5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

15.16%

-11.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

20.09%

-15.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.77%

23.50%

-15.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

23.43%

-16.43%

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XG7U.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XG7U.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

XG7U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XG7U.L
Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XG7U.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XG7U.L.

XG7U.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XG7U.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XG7U.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XG7U.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer