XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XG7U.L (Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged) and TIPA.L (Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - XG7U.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD while TIPA.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XG7U.L returned -0.79%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for TIPA.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XG7U.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for TIPA.L.

Performance

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XG7U.L achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than TIPA.L's 1.23% return.

XG7U.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: 2.90%
• 5Y*: -0.79%
• 10Y*: 2.09%

TIPA.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: 3.80%
• 5Y*: 0.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XG7U.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged	1.52%	4.67%	-0.45%	4.13%	-17.08%	5.31%	9.30%	-0.11%
TIPA.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	1.23%	6.81%	2.09%	3.51%	-12.46%	5.91%	11.05%	0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XG7U.L and TIPA.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019	0.74

The correlation between XG7U.L and TIPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XG7U.L

XG7U.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XG7U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
XG7U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XG7U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XG7U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

TIPA.L

TIPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
TIPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
TIPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
TIPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
TIPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TIPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XG7U.L	TIPA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.33	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.99	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.24	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	2.57	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.86	7.17	-2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the TIPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XG7U.L and TIPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XG7U.L	TIPA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.33	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.16	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.42	-0.09

Drawdowns

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XG7U.L drawdown since its inception was -23.33%, which is greater than TIPA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XG7U.L and TIPA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XG7U.L	TIPA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.33%	-15.11%	-8.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	-1.84%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.34%	-4.61%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.33%	-15.11%	-8.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.40%	-0.79%	-9.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-5.44%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.66%	+0.22%

Volatility

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L) at 1.28%. This indicates that XG7U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XG7U.L	TIPA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	1.28%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.17%	2.40%	+0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.93%	3.57%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.77%	5.95%	+1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.00%	6.30%	+0.70%

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XG7U.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TIPA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XG7U.L vs. TIPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XG7U.L nor TIPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XG7U.L and TIPA.L in my portfolio?

XG7U.L and TIPA.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XG7U.L or TIPA.L?

On fees, TIPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XG7U.L or TIPA.L?

TIPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XG7U.L.

What is the main difference between XG7U.L and TIPA.L?

XG7U.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD, while TIPA.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XG7U.L and 0.09% for TIPA.L.