XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE
XFVT.DE (Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and H4Z3.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XFVT.DE tracks the STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid while H4Z3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XFVT.DE returned 51.66% vs 48.84% for H4Z3.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XFVT.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for H4Z3.DE.
Performance
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFVT.DE achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than H4Z3.DE's 29.22% return.
XFVT.DE
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 51.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
H4Z3.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 29.22%
- 6M
- 31.39%
- 1Y
- 48.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XFVT.DE Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 5.73% | 50.29% | -5.50% | -0.88% |
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 29.22% | 18.60% | 13.73% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFVT.DE and H4Z3.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2023 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XFVT.DE
H4Z3.DE
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFVT.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 4.66 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 15.86 | -8.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.46%, which is greater than H4Z3.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFVT.DE and H4Z3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFVT.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.46% | -18.86% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -10.47% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -4.11% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -4.93% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 3.07% | +3.58% |
Volatility
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.DE) is 6.59%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that XFVT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4Z3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFVT.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 9.02% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.32% | 16.79% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.46% | 19.12% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 16.19% | +8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 16.19% | +8.77% |
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFVT.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z3.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFVT.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XFVT.DE nor H4Z3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XFVT.DE and H4Z3.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4Z3.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4Z3.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFVT.DE.
XFVT.DE tracks STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while H4Z3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFVT.DE and 0.15% for H4Z3.DE.
Find the right allocation for XFVT.DE and H4Z3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer