XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE
XFVT.DE (Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and EUNZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XFVT.DE tracks the STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid while EUNZ.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XFVT.DE returned 51.66% vs 26.01% for EUNZ.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XFVT.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EUNZ.DE.
Performance
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFVT.DE achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than EUNZ.DE's 21.72% return.
XFVT.DE
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 51.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 21.72%
- 6M
- 22.09%
- 1Y
- 26.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XFVT.DE Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 5.73% | 50.29% | -5.50% | -0.88% |
EUNZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 21.72% | -0.12% | 15.71% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFVT.DE and EUNZ.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XFVT.DE
EUNZ.DE
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFVT.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.45 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 11.93 | -4.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.46%, smaller than the maximum EUNZ.DE drawdown of -34.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFVT.DE and EUNZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFVT.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.46% | -34.03% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -7.51% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -2.72% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -10.17% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 2.17% | +4.48% |
Volatility
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) at 5.66%. This indicates that XFVT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFVT.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 5.66% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.32% | 11.40% | +7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.46% | 13.06% | +15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 11.61% | +13.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 13.34% | +11.62% |
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFVT.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFVT.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XFVT.DE nor EUNZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XFVT.DE and EUNZ.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFVT.DE.
XFVT.DE tracks STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFVT.DE and 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XFVT.DE and EUNZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer