XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO
XFN.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF) and XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFN.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XFN.TO returned 15.21%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for XIT.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XFN.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XIT.TO.
Performance
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFN.TO achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than XIT.TO's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XFN.TO has underperformed XIT.TO with an annualized return of 15.21%, while XIT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.72% annualized return.
XFN.TO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 17.97%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 48.08%
- 3Y*
- 31.45%
- 5Y*
- 18.22%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF | 17.97% | 34.40% | 29.32% | 13.09% | -9.92% | 35.57% | 0.99% | 20.66% | -9.76% | 12.54% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -7.03% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.74% | 45.91% | 60.88% | 11.71% | 17.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFN.TO and XIT.TO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.44 |
The correlation between XFN.TO and XIT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XFN.TO
XIT.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XFN.TO
XIT.TO
Basic Materials
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Communication Services
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Energy
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Healthcare
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Industrials
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
Real Estate
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Technology
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
Utilities
XFN.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XFN.TO
XIT.TO
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFN.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.06 | +0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.20 | 0.18 | +6.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.03 | 0.36 | +24.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, roughly equal to the maximum XIT.TO drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFN.TO and XIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFN.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.53% | -56.92% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -31.93% | +24.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.37% | -31.93% | +19.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -54.15% | +32.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | -54.15% | +14.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.01% | +17.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.95% | -16.91% | +9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 15.98% | -14.05% |
Volatility
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) is 4.08%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that XFN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFN.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 10.65% | -6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 24.63% | -14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 31.61% | -19.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 29.43% | -15.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 28.56% | -12.02% |
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFN.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XIT.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFN.TO vs. XIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF | 2.07% | 2.39% | 3.16% | 3.60% | 3.48% | 2.67% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.43% | 2.73% | 2.83% | 3.17% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFN.TO and XIT.TO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XFN.TO.
XFN.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while XIT.TO is Technology Equities. XFN.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XFN.TO and 0.60% for XIT.TO.
Find the right allocation for XFN.TO and XIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer