XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO
XFLI.TO (iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF CAD) and CMDO.TO (CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XFLI.TO is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while CMDO.TO is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XFLI.TO returned 7.23% vs 4.53% for CMDO.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFLI.TO achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than CMDO.TO's 1.93% return.
XFLI.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.32%
CMDO.TO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$15.20K | CA$29.38K | CA$28.11K | |
| CA$99.87K | CA$131.75K | CA$126.08K |
XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XFLI.TO iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF CAD | 3.13% | 2.07% | 6.23% |
CMDO.TO CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund | 1.93% | 7.40% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFLI.TO and CMDO.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XFLI.TO
CMDO.TO
XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF CAD (XFLI.TO) and CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFLI.TO | CMDO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.14 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 12.24 | -8.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFLI.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.92%, roughly equal to the maximum CMDO.TO drawdown of -6.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLI.TO and CMDO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFLI.TO | CMDO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -6.85% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.15% | -1.54% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -0.79% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -1.46% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 0.39% | +1.57% |
Volatility
XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF CAD (XFLI.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund (CMDO.TO) at 1.00%. This indicates that XFLI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFLI.TO | CMDO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.00% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.24% | 2.71% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.59% | 3.40% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 6.06% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 6.06% | +0.25% |
Dividends
XFLI.TO vs. CMDO.TO - Dividend Comparison
XFLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than CMDO.TO's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDO.TO CI Alternative Diversified Opportunities Fund | 3.84% | 3.84% | 3.97% | 3.96% | 2.15% | 1.00% |
XFLI.TO iShares Flexible Monthly Income ETF CAD | 5.45% | 5.69% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFLI.TO and CMDO.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XFLI.TO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CMDO.TO is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CI Global Asset Management.
Find the right allocation for XFLI.TO and CMDO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer