XFIX vs. ZTWO

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO).

XFIX and ZTWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XFIX is an actively managed fund by F/m. It was launched on Sep 5, 2023. ZTWO is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024.

Performance

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XFIX F/m Opportunistic Income ETF	0.11%	5.98%	0.43%
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.37%	5.49%	0.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFIX achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than ZTWO's 0.37% return.

XFIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZTWO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.

XFIX

F/m Opportunistic Income ETF

ZTWO

F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

XFIX vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFIX

XFIX Risk / Return Rank: 81
XFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
XFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ZTWO

ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFIX	ZTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.80	-0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	4.38	-1.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.62	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	4.56	-2.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.58	20.46	-11.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the ZTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFIX and ZTWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFIX	ZTWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.80	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	3.28	-1.66

Correlation

The correlation between XFIX and ZTWO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

XFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than ZTWO's 4.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
XFIX F/m Opportunistic Income ETF	5.21%	5.35%	5.50%	1.70%
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.19%	4.31%	0.39%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.66%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIX and ZTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFIX	ZTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-0.93%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.09%	-0.93%	-1.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.41%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-0.10%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.21%	+0.34%

Volatility

XFIX vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison

F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) at 0.62%. This indicates that XFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFIX	ZTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	0.62%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.10%	0.89%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31%	1.53%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.12%	1.50%	+2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.12%	1.50%	+2.62%