XFIX vs. ZTEN

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN).

XFIX and ZTEN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XFIX is an actively managed fund by F/m. It was launched on Sep 5, 2023. ZTEN is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024.

Performance

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XFIX F/m Opportunistic Income ETF	0.11%	5.98%	0.43%
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.01%	9.15%	0.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFIX achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than ZTEN's 0.01% return.

XFIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZTEN

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: 0.01%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTEN's 0.15% expense ratio.

XFIX

F/m Opportunistic Income ETF

ZTEN

F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

XFIX vs. ZTEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFIX

XFIX Risk / Return Rank: 81
XFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
XFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ZTEN

ZTEN Risk / Return Rank: 52
ZTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ZTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ZTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ZTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ZTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFIX	ZTEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.04	+0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	1.46	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.19	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	1.84	+0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.58	5.85	+2.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the ZTEN Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFIX and ZTEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFIX	ZTEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.04	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	1.26	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between XFIX and ZTEN is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Dividend Comparison

XFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than ZTEN's 5.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
XFIX F/m Opportunistic Income ETF	5.21%	5.35%	5.50%	1.70%
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	5.12%	5.16%	0.44%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.66%, which is greater than ZTEN's maximum drawdown of -3.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIX and ZTEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFIX	ZTEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-3.43%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.09%	-3.42%	+1.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-1.61%	+0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-0.70%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	1.07%	-0.52%

Volatility

XFIX vs. ZTEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (XFIX) is 0.71%, while F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that XFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFIX	ZTEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	2.64%	-1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.10%	3.53%	-2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31%	5.87%	-3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.12%	5.88%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.12%	5.88%	-1.76%