XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
XEYX.DE (BNP Paribas Easy CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XEYX.DE tracks the CAC 40® ESG while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEYX.DE returned 7.15%/yr vs 29.89%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEYX.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEYX.DE achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return.
XEYX.DE
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEYX.DE BNP Paribas Easy CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF | 0.36% | 15.20% | 2.43% | 20.02% | -9.59% | 9.61% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | -8.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEYX.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XEYX.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XEYX.DE
IBCJ.DE
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF (XEYX.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEYX.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.28 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 3.90 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 9.60 | -8.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEYX.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 1.65 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.15 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEYX.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.07%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEYX.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEYX.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.07% | -56.11% | +33.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -9.96% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.05% | -18.47% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -1.16% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -19.38% | +13.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 4.05% | +0.29% |
Volatility
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF (XEYX.DE) is 4.83%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that XEYX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEYX.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 7.13% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 17.61% | -5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 23.48% | -7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 26.72% | -9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 25.15% | -7.92% |
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEYX.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEYX.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XEYX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while IBCJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEYX.DE BNP Paribas Easy CAC 40 ESG UCITS ETF | 2.87% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.53% | 2.96% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEYX.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEYX.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEYX.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
XEYX.DE tracks CAC 40® ESG, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XEYX.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XEYX.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer