XEY vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

XEY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

XEY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF (XEY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XEY

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -2.06%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.60%
• 6M: 10.27%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 13.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XEY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF	-8.68%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	6.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XEY and OMAH is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026	0.10

Return for Risk

XEY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 76
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 67
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF (XEY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XEY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.38	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.85	—

Drawdowns

XEY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEY drawdown since its inception was -15.60%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.60%	-11.83%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.61%	-0.73%	-10.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.44%	-1.23%	-6.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XEY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.28%	8.18%	+8.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	12.85%	+3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	12.85%	+3.43%

XEY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

XEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, less than OMAH's 14.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.91%	12.86%
XEY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF	14.12%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEY and OMAH in my portfolio?

XEY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XEY or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XEY or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XEY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XEY or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.91%, compared with 14.12% for XEY.

What is the main difference between XEY and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XEY and 0.95% for OMAH.