XEY vs. LQTI
XEY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
XEY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XEY
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XEY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF | -11.75% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEY and LQTI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
XEY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQTI
XEY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF (XEY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEY drawdown since its inception was -14.58%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -3.41% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.58% | -0.57% | -14.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -0.89% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility
XEY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.12% | 5.11% | +12.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 5.92% | +11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 5.92% | +11.20% |
XEY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
XEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.42%, more than LQTI's 9.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.03% | 7.01% |
XEY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF | 11.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XEY.
XEY has the higher dividend yield at 11.42%, compared with 9.03% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XEY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for XEY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer