PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XEXP.TO (iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF) and ZWT.TO (BMO Covered Call Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XEXP.TO is passively managed, while ZWT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEXP.TO returned 17.73%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for ZWT.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEXP.TO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for ZWT.TO.

Performance

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO) and BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEXP.TO achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than ZWT.TO's 20.37% return.

XEXP.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
11.43%
YTD
21.53%
6M
13.91%
1Y
41.18%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZWT.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
12.28%
YTD
20.37%
6M
17.59%
1Y
47.17%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
23.64%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEXP.TO
iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF		21.53%13.97%9.27%24.40%1.69%
ZWT.TO
BMO Covered Call Technology ETF		20.37%18.15%49.78%65.75%-11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XEXP.TO and ZWT.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF

BMO Covered Call Technology ETF

Often compared with XEXP.TO:
XEXP.TO vs. ZXLK.TOXEXP.TO vs. INAI.TOXEXP.TO vs. TEC.TOXEXP.TO vs. QMAX.TOXEXP.TO vs. MTRX.TOXEXP.TO vs. QMVP.TOXEXP.TO vs. HTA.TO
Often compared with ZWT.TO:
ZWT.TO vs. QQQZWT.TO vs. TEC.TOZWT.TO vs. ZWB.TOZWT.TO vs. HHIS.TOZWT.TO vs. ZSP.TOZWT.TO vs. ZXLK.TOZWT.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEXP.TO
XEXP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XEXP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEXP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEXP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XEXP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEXP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO
ZWT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ZWT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO) and BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XEXP.TOZWT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.51
2.66

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.36
3.34

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.98

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

9.56

+1.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEXP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the ZWT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEXP.TO and ZWT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XEXP.TOZWT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.66

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.02

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.99

-0.07

Drawdowns

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEXP.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum ZWT.TO drawdown of -35.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEXP.TO and ZWT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEXP.TOZWT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-35.84%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-15.93%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-26.27%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-35.84%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-8.84%

+4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

4.95%

-1.07%

Volatility

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) at 4.19%. This indicates that XEXP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEXP.TOZWT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

4.19%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

13.67%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

17.81%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

23.23%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

22.98%

-4.06%

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEXP.TO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWT.TO's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEXP.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEXP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than ZWT.TO's 4.22% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021
XEXP.TO
iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF		0.54%0.65%0.80%0.63%0.21%0.00%
ZWT.TO
BMO Covered Call Technology ETF		4.22%4.46%3.34%3.83%6.54%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEXP.TO and ZWT.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEXP.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEXP.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for ZWT.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XEXP.TO and 0.71% for ZWT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEXP.TO and ZWT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer