PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XEUM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEUM.L achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XEUM.L has outperformed XDEB.L with an annualized return of 10.25%, while XDEB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


XEUM.L

1D
0.52%
1M
1.25%
YTD
6.34%
6M
8.49%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
10.25%

XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
2.04%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.74%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEUM.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
6.34%22.70%2.86%14.00%-5.29%14.84%9.94%23.14%-12.46%19.05%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XEUM.L and XDEB.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between XEUM.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEUM.L
XDEB.L

Financial Services

24.4%
14.0%

Industrials

19.5%
9.2%

Healthcare

14.1%
13.8%

Technology

9.7%
20.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
5.6%

Utilities

5.4%
8.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.1%

Energy

4.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.9%
12.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.7%

Financial Services

XEUM.L
24.4%
XDEB.L
14.0%

Industrials

XEUM.L
19.5%
XDEB.L
9.2%

Healthcare

XEUM.L
14.1%
XDEB.L
13.8%

Technology

XEUM.L
9.7%
XDEB.L
20.1%

Consumer Defensive

XEUM.L
7.2%
XDEB.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XEUM.L
5.8%
XDEB.L
5.6%

Utilities

XEUM.L
5.4%
XDEB.L
8.1%

Basic Materials

XEUM.L
5.0%
XDEB.L
1.1%

Energy

XEUM.L
4.2%
XDEB.L
4.5%

Communication Services

XEUM.L
3.9%
XDEB.L
12.1%

Real Estate

XEUM.L
0.9%
XDEB.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEUM.L
XEUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XEUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XEUM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEUM.LXDEB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.06

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.41

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

1.14

+4.77

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEUM.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEUM.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

0.33

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.66

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.69

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.78

-0.10

Drawdowns

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEUM.L drawdown since its inception was -30.91%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEUM.L and XDEB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEUM.LXDEB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.91%

-19.61%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-6.39%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-8.47%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-10.19%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

-19.61%

-11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-3.52%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-3.50%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.32%

+0.73%

Volatility

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XEUM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) at 2.66%. This indicates that XEUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEUM.LXDEB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.66%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

5.97%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

7.97%

+4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

9.68%

+4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

11.52%

+3.47%

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEUM.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XEUM.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XEUM.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEUM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEUM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.

XEUM.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XDEB.L is Global Equities. XEUM.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XEUM.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEUM.L and XDEB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer