PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XEUM.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEUM.L achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than CEUR.L's 6.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XEUM.L having a 10.25% annualized return and CEUR.L not far behind at 9.88%.


XEUM.L

1D
0.52%
1M
1.25%
YTD
6.34%
6M
8.49%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
10.25%

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.24%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.99%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEUM.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
6.34%22.70%2.86%14.00%-5.29%14.84%9.94%23.14%-12.46%19.05%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XEUM.L and CEUR.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013

0.93

The correlation between XEUM.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEUM.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

24.4%
25.1%

Industrials

19.5%
19.8%

Healthcare

14.1%
13.8%

Technology

9.7%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
6.2%

Utilities

5.4%
5.3%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.8%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.9%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.7%

Financial Services

XEUM.L
24.4%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

XEUM.L
19.5%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Healthcare

XEUM.L
14.1%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Technology

XEUM.L
9.7%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

XEUM.L
7.2%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XEUM.L
5.8%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Utilities

XEUM.L
5.4%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Basic Materials

XEUM.L
5.0%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Energy

XEUM.L
4.2%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Communication Services

XEUM.L
3.9%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Real Estate

XEUM.L
0.9%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEUM.L
XEUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XEUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XEUM.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEUM.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.74

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

6.06

-0.15

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEUM.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEUM.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.54

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.66

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.56

+0.12

Drawdowns

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEUM.L drawdown since its inception was -30.91%, which is greater than CEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEUM.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEUM.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.91%

-28.63%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-11.05%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-12.66%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-17.85%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

-28.63%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.52%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-4.58%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.17%

-0.12%

Volatility

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XEUM.L) is 4.01%, while Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that XEUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEUM.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.25%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

10.53%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

12.44%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

13.88%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

14.97%

+0.02%

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEUM.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XEUM.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XEUM.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XEUM.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XEUM.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEUM.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer