PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (XEU.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEU.TO achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 21.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XEU.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 9.91%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.96% annualized return.


XEU.TO

1D
1.25%
1M
4.74%
YTD
8.15%
6M
9.58%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
9.91%

ZEB.TO

1D
1.64%
1M
6.82%
YTD
21.18%
6M
24.38%
1Y
63.15%
3Y*
34.10%
5Y*
18.56%
10Y*
15.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEU.TO
iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF
8.15%29.40%9.36%17.36%-10.48%16.36%3.16%18.30%-8.11%18.48%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
21.18%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XEU.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2014

0.49

The correlation between XEU.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEU.TO
ZEB.TO

Financial Services

22.5%
100.0%

Industrials

15.6%

-

Healthcare

10.5%

-

Technology

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

5.3%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Utilities

3.5%

-

Communication Services

3.3%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Financial Services

XEU.TO
22.5%
ZEB.TO
100.0%

Industrials

XEU.TO
15.6%
ZEB.TO

-

Healthcare

XEU.TO
10.5%
ZEB.TO

-

Technology

XEU.TO
8.4%
ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XEU.TO
8.0%
ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XEU.TO
6.5%
ZEB.TO

-

Basic Materials

XEU.TO
5.3%
ZEB.TO

-

Energy

XEU.TO
4.0%
ZEB.TO

-

Utilities

XEU.TO
3.5%
ZEB.TO

-

Communication Services

XEU.TO
3.3%
ZEB.TO

-

Real Estate

XEU.TO
1.4%
ZEB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEU.TO
XEU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XEU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (XEU.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEU.TOZEB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.94

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

7.52

-5.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

32.34

-25.99

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEU.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEU.TOZEB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

5.00

-3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.38

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.95

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.89

-0.35

Drawdowns

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEU.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.02%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEU.TO and ZEB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEU.TOZEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.02%

-39.69%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-8.44%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-14.80%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-25.97%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.02%

-39.69%

+7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.39%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-5.65%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.96%

+1.13%

Volatility

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (XEU.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) have volatilities of 5.09% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEU.TOZEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.08%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

11.16%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

12.71%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

13.53%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

16.91%

-0.82%

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEU.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEU.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEU.TO
iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF
2.28%2.47%2.68%2.96%3.03%2.42%1.98%3.56%3.28%2.27%2.91%2.33%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.49%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEU.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XEU.TO.

XEU.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. XEU.TO tracks Morningstar Eur GR CAD, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XEU.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEU.TO and ZEB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer