PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF (XETM.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF (UTIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XETM.TO achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly higher than UTIL.TO's 17.98% return.


XETM.TO

1D
-4.12%
1M
14.61%
YTD
27.20%
6M
37.88%
1Y
132.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UTIL.TO

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.15%
YTD
17.98%
6M
15.99%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XETM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF
27.20%74.97%5.16%-2.24%
UTIL.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF
17.98%19.08%8.82%4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XETM.TO and UTIL.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XETM.TO
XETM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XETM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XETM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XETM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XETM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XETM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.TO
UTIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UTIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF (XETM.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF (UTIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XETM.TOUTIL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.56

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

5.86

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.31

16.26

+2.06

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XETM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the UTIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XETM.TO and UTIL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XETM.TOUTIL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

2.82

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.61

+0.40

Drawdowns

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XETM.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than UTIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XETM.TO and UTIL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XETM.TOUTIL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-25.61%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-4.62%

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-1.15%

-2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-7.89%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

1.67%

+5.57%

Volatility

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF (XETM.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF (UTIL.TO) at 3.44%. This indicates that XETM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XETM.TOUTIL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.89%

3.44%

+10.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.22%

7.87%

+23.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.67%

9.60%

+30.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.24%

12.55%

+22.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.24%

12.55%

+22.69%

Dividends

XETM.TO vs. UTIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

XETM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than UTIL.TO's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
UTIL.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF
3.39%4.07%4.38%4.45%1.87%
XETM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF
0.52%0.66%0.69%0.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XETM.TO and UTIL.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XETM.TO is categorized as Materials, while UTIL.TO is Utilities Equities. XETM.TO tracks S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index, while UTIL.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XETM.TO and UTIL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer