XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO
XESG.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF) and XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XESG.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XESG.TO returned 12.78%/yr vs 32.16%/yr for XEG.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XESG.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XEG.TO.
Performance
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XESG.TO achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.98% return.
XESG.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- YTD
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.86%
XEG.TO
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 34.10%
- YTD
- 44.98%
- 1Y
- 62.68%
- 3Y*
- 25.57%
- 5Y*
- 32.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$55.41M | CA$49.18M | CA$55.92M | |
| CA$124.11K | CA$192.49K | CA$202.20K |
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XESG.TO iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF | 12.54% | 26.34% | 20.23% | 10.30% | -7.64% | 23.09% | 1.14% | 12.07% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 44.98% | 16.72% | 14.04% | 3.55% | 53.25% | 83.71% | -34.44% | -7.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XESG.TO and XEG.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XESG.TO and XEG.TO has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Energy
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
Basic Materials
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Industrials
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Technology
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Utilities
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Real Estate
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Communication Services
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Healthcare
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XESG.TO
XEG.TO
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XESG.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.82 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.69 | 11.57 | +1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESG.TO and XEG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XESG.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.40% | -87.51% | +48.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -16.47% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.14% | -25.67% | +11.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -28.42% | +10.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.58% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -34.51% | +29.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 5.44% | -3.31% |
Volatility
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) is 2.49%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that XESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XESG.TO | XEG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 6.80% | -4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 19.71% | -8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 24.10% | -10.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 28.59% | -14.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 33.40% | -11.57% |
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XESG.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison
XESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than XEG.TO's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 2.54% | 3.63% | 3.46% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 1.64% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 3.58% |
XESG.TO iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.57% | 2.89% | 2.77% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XESG.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XESG.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESG.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.
XESG.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. XESG.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XESG.TO and 0.60% for XEG.TO.
Find the right allocation for XESG.TO and XEG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer