PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESG.TO achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.98% return.


XESG.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
2.11%
6M
7.81%
YTD
12.54%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.86%

XEG.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
14.91%
6M
34.10%
YTD
44.98%
1Y
62.68%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
32.16%
10Y*
11.93%
ALL TIME*
4.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$55.41MCA$49.18MCA$55.92M
CA$124.11KCA$192.49KCA$202.20K

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF
12.54%26.34%20.23%10.30%-7.64%23.09%1.14%12.07%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
44.98%16.72%14.04%3.55%53.25%83.71%-34.44%-7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XESG.TO and XEG.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between XESG.TO and XEG.TO has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XESG.TO
XEG.TO

Financial Services

40.3%

-

Energy

18.1%
100.0%

Basic Materials

16.7%

-

Industrials

8.5%

-

Technology

8.2%

-

Utilities

3.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.3%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Financial Services

XESG.TO
40.3%
XEG.TO

-

Energy

XESG.TO
18.1%
XEG.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

XESG.TO
16.7%
XEG.TO

-

Industrials

XESG.TO
8.5%
XEG.TO

-

Technology

XESG.TO
8.2%
XEG.TO

-

Utilities

XESG.TO
3.0%
XEG.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XESG.TO
2.8%
XEG.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XESG.TO
1.3%
XEG.TO

-

Real Estate

XESG.TO
0.6%
XEG.TO

-

Communication Services

XESG.TO
0.1%
XEG.TO

-

Healthcare

XESG.TO
0.0%
XEG.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XESG.TO
XESG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESG.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.82

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.69

11.57

+1.13

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESG.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESG.TO and XEG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESG.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-87.51%

+48.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-16.47%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

-25.67%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-28.42%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-3.58%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-34.51%

+29.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

5.44%

-3.31%

Volatility

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) is 2.49%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that XESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESG.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

6.80%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

19.71%

-8.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

24.10%

-10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

28.59%

-14.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.83%

33.40%

-11.57%

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESG.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XESG.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than XEG.TO's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.54%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF
1.91%2.17%2.57%2.89%2.77%2.01%2.30%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XESG.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESG.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESG.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.

XESG.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. XESG.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XESG.TO and 0.60% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESG.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer