PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XESG.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF) and XCH.TO (iShares China Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XESG.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XCH.TO is a China Equities fund tracking the Morningstar China GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XESG.TO returned 12.49%/yr vs -0.72%/yr for XCH.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XESG.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for XCH.TO.

Performance

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) and iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESG.TO achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than XCH.TO's -6.21% return.

XESG.TO

1D
0.81%
1M
1.78%
YTD
10.50%
6M
7.97%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
—

XCH.TO

1D
1.21%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
-6.21%
6M
-7.43%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
-0.72%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF		10.50%26.34%20.23%10.30%-7.64%23.09%1.14%12.07%
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF		-6.21%22.48%39.50%-14.76%-15.40%-20.56%7.17%-3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XESG.TO and XCH.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.31

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XESG.TO
XCH.TO

Financial Services

38.5%
34.5%

Energy

19.3%
5.2%

Basic Materials

17.9%
3.8%

Industrials

8.9%
3.9%

Technology

8.3%
9.0%

Utilities

2.7%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
25.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
0.8%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.1%

Communication Services

0.1%
12.5%

Healthcare

0.1%
2.1%

Financial Services

XESG.TO
38.5%
XCH.TO
34.5%

Energy

XESG.TO
19.3%
XCH.TO
5.2%

Basic Materials

XESG.TO
17.9%
XCH.TO
3.8%

Industrials

XESG.TO
8.9%
XCH.TO
3.9%

Technology

XESG.TO
8.3%
XCH.TO
9.0%

Utilities

XESG.TO
2.7%
XCH.TO
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XESG.TO
2.2%
XCH.TO
25.6%

Consumer Defensive

XESG.TO
1.9%
XCH.TO
0.8%

Real Estate

XESG.TO
0.2%
XCH.TO
1.1%

Communication Services

XESG.TO
0.1%
XCH.TO
12.5%

Healthcare

XESG.TO
0.1%
XCH.TO
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF

iShares China Index ETF

Often compared with XESG.TO:
XESG.TO vs. XCSR.TOXESG.TO vs. XEQT.TOXESG.TO vs. SCHGXESG.TO vs. VFV.TOXESG.TO vs. SPYXESG.TO vs. XIU.TOXESG.TO vs. GEQT.TO
Often compared with XCH.TO:
XCH.TO vs. VEE.TOXCH.TO vs. XEC.TOXCH.TO vs. XAW.TOXCH.TO vs. ZCH.TOXCH.TO vs. VFV.TOXCH.TO vs. XIC.TOXCH.TO vs. FBRT

Return for Risk

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XESG.TO
XESG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
XCH.TO
XCH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) and iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XESG.TOXCH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.14
-0.04

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
0.08

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.01

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

-0.05

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

-0.09

+13.76

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESG.TO and XCH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum XCH.TO drawdown of -58.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESG.TO and XCH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XESG.TOXCH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-58.02%

+18.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-16.51%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

-27.28%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-50.32%

+32.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-58.02%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-21.70%

+20.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-20.40%

+15.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

8.55%

-6.43%

Volatility

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) is 4.58%, while iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that XESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XESG.TOXCH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

5.94%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

13.42%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

19.18%

-5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

29.79%

-15.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.98%

25.71%

-3.73%

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESG.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XCH.TO's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

XESG.TO vs. XCH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than XCH.TO's 2.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF		2.25%2.11%1.54%2.86%2.35%1.51%2.17%2.50%2.45%2.41%2.21%2.58%
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF		1.99%2.17%2.57%2.89%2.77%2.01%2.30%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XESG.TO and XCH.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESG.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESG.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for XCH.TO.

XESG.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XCH.TO is China Equities. XESG.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XCH.TO tracks Morningstar China GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XESG.TO and 0.87% for XCH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESG.TO and XCH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer