PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XESG.TO vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XESG.TO vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XESG.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XESG.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XESG.TO returned 12.49%/yr vs 15.42%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XESG.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XESG.TO is traded in CAD, while EMXC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMXC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESG.TO achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 40.03% return.

XESG.TO

1D
0.81%
1M
1.78%
YTD
10.50%
6M
7.97%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
—

EMXC

1D
0.74%
1M
4.61%
YTD
40.03%
6M
44.26%
1Y
72.44%
3Y*
28.36%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF		10.50%26.34%20.23%10.30%-7.64%23.09%1.14%12.07%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		40.03%28.97%11.37%16.13%-14.46%8.48%10.08%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XESG.TO and EMXC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.49

The correlation between XESG.TO and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XESG.TO
EMXC

Financial Services

38.5%
17.4%

Energy

19.3%
3.4%

Basic Materials

17.9%
6.0%

Industrials

8.9%
6.9%

Technology

8.3%
52.4%

Utilities

2.7%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.8%

Communication Services

0.1%
3.0%

Healthcare

0.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

XESG.TO
38.5%
EMXC
17.4%

Energy

XESG.TO
19.3%
EMXC
3.4%

Basic Materials

XESG.TO
17.9%
EMXC
6.0%

Industrials

XESG.TO
8.9%
EMXC
6.9%

Technology

XESG.TO
8.3%
EMXC
52.4%

Utilities

XESG.TO
2.7%
EMXC
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XESG.TO
2.2%
EMXC
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

XESG.TO
1.9%
EMXC
2.4%

Real Estate

XESG.TO
0.2%
EMXC
0.8%

Communication Services

XESG.TO
0.1%
EMXC
3.0%

Healthcare

XESG.TO
0.1%
EMXC
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Often compared with XESG.TO:
XESG.TO vs. XCSR.TOXESG.TO vs. XEQT.TOXESG.TO vs. SCHGXESG.TO vs. VFV.TOXESG.TO vs. SPYXESG.TO vs. XIU.TOXESG.TO vs. GEQT.TO
Often compared with EMXC:
EMXC vs. XCEMEMXC vs. IEMGEMXC vs. VWOEMXC vs. EEMEMXC vs. SPEMEMXC vs. VEXCEMXC vs. VNM

Return for Risk

XESG.TO vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XESG.TO
XESG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XESG.TOEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.14
2.87

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
3.50

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

5.26

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

19.09

-5.41

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESG.TO and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESG.TO and EMXC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XESG.TOEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-33.73%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-13.17%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

-14.58%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-23.49%

+5.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-3.20%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-7.02%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

3.63%

-1.51%

Volatility

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) is 4.58%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.89%. This indicates that XESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XESG.TOEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

12.89%

-8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

22.13%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

24.17%

-10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

19.06%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.98%

21.05%

+0.93%

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESG.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XESG.TO vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

XESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than EMXC's 2.05% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		2.05%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF		1.99%2.17%2.57%2.89%2.77%2.01%2.30%1.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XESG.TO and EMXC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESG.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESG.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

XESG.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. XESG.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XESG.TO and 0.49% for EMXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESG.TO and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer